2) You want one or the other or you will have stability issues due to lack of religious unity changes to Rajputana. 1) Both are decent - I believe the general consensus is that Mewar ideas are better for multi-player, whilst Rajputana ideas are better for WC. Also, I highly recommend a Mewar -> Rajputana game as Mewar is quite a fun nation to try out the Dharma features. Overall: The Rajputana ideas are very strong with the only weakness in the idea set being the Yearly legitimacy and probably the Artillery cost reduction (late game costs won't matter). The Rajput Kingdom reform, combined with it's first national idea make it so that army tradition. A combination of these factors makes Mewar an extremely powerful nation securing dominance over most of India. 7 comments Mewar is a somewhat misleading nation, at first glance, it seems like a fairly minor nation in the grand scheme of things in India, however, Mewar has excellent military focused national ideas and a mission tree that grants permanent claims over most of Northern India. Rajputana also have 10% movement speed and 15% cavalry ability but again, not much cavalry later in the game. Which ideas are stronger military wise? The difference is 10% moral of armies in Rajputana vs 10% infantry combat ability for Mewar. Hey everyone, I have a question regarding Mewar and Rajputana.
0 kommentar(er)
